On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:35:53 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:27:42 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:03:33 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
Harry Krause wrote in message
news:1100958988.eHbW4nrZO30sidk9GFsjeA@teranews...

I'm sorry, but I have very little respect for "the military" as an
institution. As it exists today, it is an obsolete institution built
upon lies, deceit and self-perpetuation and is virtually useless in
defending the United States from the kind of aggression we face these
days. Simply stated, our military cannot defend us from the terrorists
who want to create havoc and death within the borders of the United
States.


Whew... I think it's the policy makers Harry, not the "military".

Oh? Please explain how "our military" plans to defend a major American
city from a couple of guys driving into the center of it in a rental van
with a nuke inside. You don't really think hordes of terrorists are
planning to come ashore via LSTs at Newport, Rhode Island, do you?

Remember, our military is supposed to defend the homeland. Something it
is incapable of doing in the face of modern terrorist warfare.

The mission of the Department of Defense is.

The mission of the Department of Homeland Security

It doesn't matter. Neither of them can defend the homeland.

What doesn't matter is your lack of subject knowledge.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


After we're attacked again, I'll be sure to remind you that neither our
DoD nor homeland security can defend this country.

What's your idea, Harry? How would you defend the country?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!