On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:07:53 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:35:55 -0500, JohnH wrote:


As you liberals like to say: "it's not quite so black and white". The
GC specifically addresses the issue of illegal combatants...and states
that they're not entitled to protection under the GC.

That's a canard, a bull**** issue.


No, it's *the* issue. It wouldn't allow for liberal bitching and whining
however, so I can understand your comment.

Well, then perhaps we should get it right. "Illegal combatants" are not
covered under the Third Geneva Convention, but they are covered by the
Fourth Geneva Convention. They are afforded rights, just not the same
rights afforded "legal combatants".

And they're getting them. So. Stop whining. Tell us about your last
fishing trip. Did you catch anything worthwhile?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!