On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 08:35:10 -0500, thunder
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:12:56 +0000, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
I'd rather have a straight flat tax system of some sort to prevent this
kind of nonsense.
I'm all for a simplified tax system, but I wonder how long even a flat tax
system would stay simple. A loophole here, and a loophole there, and we
once again have a mess. However, I would agree a flat tax would be
preferable to a sales tax (at least I think that's your preference).
I am not a fiscal Puritan in that I despise all taxes. I'm willing to
pay my fair share into the common wealth of the nation. And I believe
that my share should be the same as people who are less well off and
those more well off - I worked hard for my money, ruined my overall
health doing it and I want to keep it. For that, I'm willing to pay,
right off the top - no excuses, 15% of what I make every year even
though I'm retired.
What I object to is the whole issue of using the term "revenue" rather
than what it is - taxes. Puts the entire concept into a whole new
light.
What I object to are sweet heart deals with the State that allows a
company like Verizon to give a 10% discount to State workers on top of
any promotional discounts - real citizens of the state, who pay the
freakin' bills - aren't given that privilege.
What I object to is the State DMV staffing a local office on a
Saturday, for three months in a row, with people who can't speak, or
have an extremely low grasp of, English thus justifying closing the
office because of lack of business. (That is not a joke)
I object to "fees" that aren't designated to the subject for which
they are issued - hunting and fishing licenses being a good example.
I object to hiring tax accountants and lawyers to keep the government
from raping me at the end of the year just because I worked hard to
obtain what I have and I want to keep it.
I object to long winded rants about stuff. :)
I don't know what the answer is, but we need to solve it quickly or
we're just going to keep shooting ourselves in the foot.
Later,
Tom
|