Well first of all you have to look at the context of the issue.

New York had no one suitable and hired a professional outsider from
Arkansas. Pay mercenary wages you get mercenary results.

Second the word "river". Should she support that the leap from Hudson to
White is not a far stretch, something she doesn't want the pubic reminded
about.

Third, as Congressman At Large (the proper term for what used to be
Senators) New York to her is no different than was Arkansas, a stepping
stone...to be stepped on, pushed into the mud, and then left behind.

However she remains, at present the only choice the Democrats have now due
solely to a media perceived 'stature', having actually slept or whatever in
the White House, and of course being a woman has not military service
baggage to live down.

Ergo.....Hillary in 2008. It ain't rockitscience.

Now the Republicans have a much larger problem they are startingfrom
scratch....or are they? A Veep after all only serves two purposes. Get
votes for the Prez and make him assassination proof. Gore, Edwards and
whatshisname from ....where was it a case in point (the one who was veep
under Bush Senior). So discounting the myth that Veeps have presidential
qualities Hillary may very well be facing Powell or someone of similar
stature.

I'm lovin' it!

M.




"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
first: hillary is not the only one concerned about the sound. there are
and
have been many others, republican and democrat.


Excuse me, but YOU are the one who questioned what she had done. Now that
you
have some examples you are saying it doesn't count because people are also
fighting the good fight.
Give me a break! The only question that remains is one about her "long
term
service" when the woman has only been a senator for a short while!
Give it up, bub.

RB