In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 29 Oct 2004 10:17:36 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

Of the sort like Prisssssilla Owens? That freak of nature shouldn't be on
any bench, except maybe a park bench.

Of any sort.

So, then you don't agree that she should have been appointed by
Bush.

I haven't followed her opinions enough to have a view on that score. But
based on the people who opposed her I suspect she might make a pretty good
Ct. of Appeals judge. How many decisions where she was in the majority have
been reversed by the Supremes?

I don't know. I've only read a bit about her radical views. You should
check it out and let us know from your professional opinion. :-)

I do think the tactic of refusing to report out judicial nominations, and
requiring a 2/3 vote to confirm, are outrageous abuses of the power to
advise and consent. Another example of refusing to follow the Constitutional
process based solely on the result of the process if properly applied.

Sorry... don't understand the reference. Are you talking about the
Senate confirmation of appointees? If so, the Republicans have had
quite a time these 12 years. Seems they've been on both sides of the
same issue. Flip floppers all.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."