In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 15:17:48 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

When Bush was asked about the missing weapons, he had NO
response. None. He just stood there, open-mouthed.

You, on the other don't seem to suffer from such an infirmity. So perhaps
you can provide that believable explanation of how, in a period of a few
weeks, 35 or 40 truckloads of explosives were moved to an undisclosed
location without detection at a time when about the only traffic on the
roads was U.S. military vehicles. I'm willing to consider the possibility
that the explosives were there when the first troops arrived, and also the
possibility that they were removed before the troops arrived. But I have to
ask which is the more likely scenario. What's the Dem party line on this
specific question? How were those explosives moved?

No idea. The inspectors were told to leave by the Bush
administration. I think there needs to be an investigation,
something Bush was incapable of articulating.

He stood there incapable of saying anything. He's an embarrassment.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."