I never said it was anyone else but Gould who wrote the article, and I
believe it was him. I said and believe it was a well written article, but
it was a fluff PR piece. Their was no comparison of other high performance
batteries, there were no test to verify the information being given by the
president of the company. I said this is not unusual in the boating mag
industry, but I did think it was important when people read boating mags
they understood who there real customers are, and it is not the consumer.

What would you call the article if it was not a fluff PR piece.


"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
Jon Smithe wrote:
How was I purposely offensive? What I have said was the common response
by most of the people discussing boating mags.

What really has me confused is what did I say that sounded like fascism,
in this thread or any thread.

I am very interested to see when I became a fascist.

"Oh gosh, Oh dear, I certainly didn't mean to offend Mr. Gould when I said
that his article was advertising fluff and probably written by an agency
hired by the company."

After your persistent and irrational attacks on Chuck Gould in political
threads, to now make a personal attack when he is contributing useful
information, as well as good on topic reading, disgusting. That you try
and put on an innocent face afterwards is worse.

Into the sack of shreiking useless Bush-Cheney cheerleaders you go. Don't
worry, you'll like it in there.

DSK