|
|
|
|
DSK wrote:
Nav wrote:
Yes. http://www.dellamente.com Here you a
"Harland & Wolff were quite limited technically, with only their own
experience to draw on. They were aware of the power and economy the
turbine offered, although still unsure of its reliability, and chose
to play it safe ..."
Or is this another site that knows less than you about the Titanic?
It conflicts with what I've read about the design parameters laid out
for the Olympic class ships and discussion between Bruce Ismay (do you
even know who he is without Google?) and Lord Pirrie. I suggest you look
further. An excellent start would be to ask the question directly on the
Encyclopedia Titanica engineering forum.
I don't think you will, because I don't think you're interested in the
answer. You seem to be more interested in Jaxlike posturing and posing.
Certainly, a person with training in naval architecture would be able to
figure out prop slip, and would probably know where to find a good
reference to condensate depression.
Now THAT'S posturing!
Cheers
|