"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"basskisser" atl_man2@a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com" onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"Harry Krause" piedtypecase@a
href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=1&k=yahoo%20com"
onmouseover="window.status='yahoo.com'; return true;"
onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;"yahoo.com/a wrote in
message
...

Under Cheney, Halliburton Helped Saddam Hussein Siphon Billions from
UN Oil-for-Food Program

By Jason Leopold

The plagiarist? LOL.



One company that...wasn't...in Duelfer's report was
Halliburton

Enough said. According to Duelfer's report, Halliburton did none of
what
Leopold accuses them of.

Where in Duelfer's report does it state that Halliburton did none of
what Leopold accuses them of?

Where does it say it did?

Asslicker once again with the losing debate tactic of wnating a negative
proved.....what a mar00n

Fritz, you HAVE to be one of the dumbest people here!! Let's see, NOYB
says, in essence, that because the Duelfer report didn't include
Halliburton in it, that they are automatically not guilty of anything
Leopold accuses them of. You seem to buy THAT lock, stock and barrel,
correct?
So, using that very same logic, turned 180 degrees, one could just as
well conclude that, because the Duelfer report didn't specifically say
that Halliburton DIDN'T do anything, that they could be guilty. SAME
****ing logic, dumb ass!!!!!