Very nice dodge. I like the way you turned the conversation from you making
a completely unsubstiated defamatory "opinion" to wither or not I saw any
difference between the 1st and 2nd debate. Very good dodge, but not much of
anything else.

In my statement, I stated Bush did a poor job in the first debate and did a
respectable job in the 2nd debate. There are so many reason for a
difference in performance, and drugs would be one of the very last. The
fact that you actually believe drugs is the most likely explanation says
more about you than about Bush.

By the way, have you found once piece of legistlation that Kerry sponsored
that you think is important?


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Weren't you the person who proposed Bush must be on drugs for him to have
a
poor showing on the first debate, and then have a respectable showing in
the
2nd debate?

Please substantiate that bit of bull****.

Nice Dodge. Your wife drive a Chrysler?

I expressed an opinion, wondering why Bush was so different in the second
debate.

Some right wing reactionary stated as a fact, not an opinion "John Kerry
will
put in a 50 cent a gallon gas tax right away and another later on." Should
be
easily substantiated by quoting some bit of Kerry's energy proposal. So
far,
dead silence from the right and shameful attempts to switch the subject.

If it is your opinion that there was no difference in GWB's performance
between
debate 1 and debate 2, fine. You're entitled.