OH GREAT
so you all read the report in the new york times today
nice switch of stories!
amazing.

gf.


OzOne wrote in message news
On 08 Oct 2004 04:37:55 GMT, (SAIL LOCO) scribbled
thusly:

but we could have done it the right way, with
the full support of the rest of the world, similar to what
Bush I did. Bush II decided to ignore diplomacy and now we've
got a terrible mess..

Considering 12 years went buy how much longer should we have waited for
the
"rest of the world"? Also considering the UN is now made up mostly of
murdering thug dictators what do you think it would have taken to get
them on
board?
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"Trains are a winter sport"

Interesting,,,12 years, but what was the hurry after 12 years, little
had changed except that Saddam had destroyed his WMD, dismantled any
fledgling nuke program, and was co operating although grudgingly with
the weapons inspectors...in hindsight he was ****ed off because he'd
already said he had no WMD.

He was no harboring terrorists, had nothing to do with 9/11 and as
Condoleza said, the US didn't want the smoking gun to turn into a
mushroom cloud...pity she didn't look at ALL the intelligence and
reports from weapons inspectors before making that gaffe, there was no
gun maybe it was a dangerous cigar


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.