"Jim Donohue" wrote in message
news:eh09d.167$_a3.74@fed1read05...
The Saudi Royals allowed the radicals free rain and bribed the hell out of
them to keep control of the country. The strength of the radicals in
Saudi
Arabia is directly traceable to malfeasance and nonfeasance by the Royals.
They provided the climate that enabled 9/11 and have still done nothing
significant to end the role of the Saudi radicals. Given their position
their country should have been first on our list of the "degenerate
backers
of terrorists". A whole lot better case there then against Saddam.
Strategically much more important and useful as well. Bush just lacked
the
balls to sieze control of Mecca. He is afriad of the Terrorists.

LOL. Sure he is. Bush was protecting our economy. Following Bush's plan,
we can still seize Mecca...but only after we have secured an oil source from
a country or two *besides* Saudi Arabia.



The final report out today by the US Arms investigators...No WMDs, No WMD
programs...no hidden WMDs. Apparently the report you are pushing are
considered by the professionals as less than believeable.

You've chosen to believe a couple of sound-bites from the liberal news
media. But there is a lot more to the report than you've let on. Hell,
it's 1500 pages. Duelfer wouldn't need 1500 pages to say no WMD, no WMD
programs, and no hidden WMD.