In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 06 Oct 2004 15:20:06 GMT, (Bobsprit) said:

They said that the debate was "nearly a draw"
and that "Cheney failed to respond to Edward's attacks"

That one's really a hoot. The most telling point in the debate was when
Edwards was asked how he expected to bring allies aboard when the two major
potential allies have already said "no thanks, even if Kerry is elected."
Edwards managed to yammer on for the entire two minutes without once coming
close to addressing the question asked. It's a pity that Cheney didn't come
back with a simple "Could you please repeat the question for the Senator. He
doesn't seem to have heard it."

That was probably Edwards' weakest moment. Of course, Cheney had
plenty of his as well. I especially thought he looked vice-
presidential when he LIED about the body count not being 90% our
troops.

I'm hardly surprised at the Times, given their obvious inclinations.

But loco said they called it a draw?? doesn't sound left-leaning to me
Mr. Poodle.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."