In article ,
Harry Krause wrote:


NOYB wrote:
http://www.unf-unf.de/show.php?did=664

Personally, I think it's the Clinton's doing.


It's the wrath of Hillary!

Seriously, the few analytical reports I've seen seem to tie the increase
in storms to a side effect of global warming.

Bull****.

Two of the best-known and most-well-respected hurricane analysts (Gray being
one, *******i being another) have said that is complete bull****.

Specifically, "global warming", were it real, would tend to DIMINISH
hurricane activity since it would lessen the gradients that drive these
storms.

Second, there is a roughly 30 year cycle in hurricane activity, with 60
years for a complete "cycle".

We have been in a 30 year LOW. Now we're entering a 30 year HIGH. The last
"high" cycle ended roughly in 1970.

If you actually LOOK at the data, instead of simply trying to fit what's
happening to something you WANT to see, this becomes rather obvious.

Indeed, it requires no "hard science" - just a look at the numbers. The 40s
to 70s had more hurricanes, the 70s to 00s had less, the 10s to 40s had
more, etc.

What this means is that we're due for 30 years of this chit - and it has
nothing to do with "global anything"; its a normal cyclical weather pattern.

--
--
Karl Denninger ) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind