|
|
|
|
I am beginning to think it is more than just being "dumb as dirt". There
must be a physiological or psychology reason for his inability to
comprehend simple concepts.
"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news tA2d.207199$mD.48085@attbi_s02...
Basskisser,
So was there any debt during Clinton's administration? If not, why
does
the
US government disagree with you. According to them, the debt increased
every year during the 8 yrs Clinton was in office.
It seems that not only do you goosestep to the democratic line, but you
don't understand the democratic line.
He's just dumber than a tree stump.....and insists on proving it on a
daily basis posting in this NG.
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:xYl2d.445335$%_6.93194@attbi_s01...
Well you did say, " "There was NO debt when Bush took over. None,
nada,
zilch. A balanced budget." and then you said " If you
have
debt,
the budget isn't balanced.
You keep for getting THAT key word, BALANCED"
Since you agree you did not make a mistake in your statement, I
would
be
very interested where you saw that the National Debt when Bush
took
office
was none, nada, zilch.
According to the US government the National Debt grew each year
Clinton
was
in office and was in excess of $5.6 trillion when Bush took
office.
The table below shows the growth of the National Debt since
Clinton
took
office.
09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 3,665,303,351,697.03
Is it possible that you do not understand the difference between
the
words,
debt and deficit?
He also is too stupid to to know what 'budget' means
Uh, no...it's just that YOU are too ****ing dumb to know what the
word
BALANCED means......
|