"P.Fritz" wrote in message ...
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message
news:xYl2d.445335$%_6.93194@attbi_s01...
Well you did say, " "There was NO debt when Bush took over. None, nada,
zilch. A balanced budget." and then you said " If you have debt,
the budget isn't balanced.
You keep for getting THAT key word, BALANCED"

Since you agree you did not make a mistake in your statement, I would be
very interested where you saw that the National Debt when Bush took office
was none, nada, zilch.

According to the US government the National Debt grew each year Clinton
was
in office and was in excess of $5.6 trillion when Bush took office.

The table below shows the growth of the National Debt since Clinton took
office.

09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 3,665,303,351,697.03

Is it possible that you do not understand the difference between the
words,
debt and deficit?

He also is too stupid to to know what 'budget' means

Uh, no...it's just that YOU are too ****ing dumb to know what the word
BALANCED means......