"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I don't recall such a tirade after any of Dean's speeches, or after any
of
Harry's posts? Why is that?
John H
Because you have a selective memory?
I don't read even close to half of Harry's posts. He can be extremely
prolific,
and I don't always have the time. After the first or second post in a
thread it
usually devolves into one of the usual suspects exchanging childish
insults
with Harry. Boooooooring. "mark read".
He was talking about your tirades, Chuck! You profess to give everyone equal
time and attention but, you seem to always avoid criticizing liberals and
progressives.
Several times a year I express displeasure with Harry's style. I agree
with him
on many (not all) issues, but disagree about the appropriate tone of
discourse
in a public forum. Next time I chastise Harry for his style, perhaps you
will
make take note of it.
Harry is a lonely old bully. His ability to use words is very good but, he
has directed his invective at the soldiers and not the generals.
I cannot remember Howard Dean reeling off an impassioned string of
deliberate
falsehoods that could even make a pale comparison to Zell Miller's
scandalous,
amoral, flip flop attack on his formerly "close friend" and "true American
hero", John Kerry.
Scandalous, amoral and flip flop attack? The fate of western civilization is
at stake and Kerry want's to make nice with those that will not stop until
we are dead or until we kill them. On the other hand Bush understands the
desires of those allied against us and is ready to defend us by killing our
enemy.
If, this November, we sincere patriots and sons of Liberty save the
country
from a group of folks who want to set fire to the Consitution and spend us
into
oblivion (ala the Soviet Union), I suspect that Zell Miller's "close
friend"
will not invite him to the inaugural ball.
You've got it wrong again Chuck. Zell Miller will be attending an inaugural
event or two while Kerry will be crying on Teresa's shoulder about how the
American people just didn't understand.
|