"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
ink.net...


dixon wrote:

After seeing the movie 9/11, I saw some very obvious lies on moores
part.
The part is surely trick photography where bush sits in a class of
kids
with
a deer in the headlights look on his face for seven minutes after
hearing
the country is being attacked. No world leader, in this nuclear age
would
ever do anything that stupid. Is moore seriously trying to make us
believe
that with jet pilots working like a nascar pit crew to practice
getting
airborne quickly, the president would be such an idiot to do nothing
while
planes were on thier way to the pentagon? Other than this everything
else
seemed believable in the movie.

--


--
Dixon


This is very interesting, and a view that is common with our
conservative friends.

Dixon says "some very obvious lies", then points out one thing that's
undeniably true, then says "Other than this everything else seemed
believable in the movie."

Where are the obvious lies?

There are a number of them. One of them, for instance, is the claim that
Bush was responsible for members of the Saudi family leaving the US 2
days
after 9/11.

He was! His administration made the damned arrangements.

Actually, it was just one seedy, partisan, and underhanded individual named
Richard Clarke who made the arrangements. Go check your facts!

Are you REALLY, HONESTLY saying that Richard Clarke did so without ANY
input from Bush? Really, now, tell me the truth, do you actually
believe that??? If so, I've got some land I'd like to sell you...