Capt. Mooron wrote:
No Doug it wasn't experimental and I doubt a Corbin 39 could match a Cabo
38.. I have sailed both vessels.

I wonder what was wrong with the Corbin 39 you sailed. I've sailed one
too. For a tank it's pretty good.

...The Bayfield 40 would be left well behind
both the Corbin39 and the Cabo38. I haven't sailed the Bayfield 40 but I
have sailed the Bayfield 32... it's a slug! So are all the Bayfields...
exceptionally slow vessels. You'd better adjust your "numbers" .

Yeah, I was surprised when that one showed up. I think the "sail area"
numbers published by Bayfield include the genoa, not just the
foretriangle. I have not sailed a Bayfield 40 but have some of their
smaller boats, and yeah, they're slugs.

So we can agree that among slugs & tanks, the Cabo Rico 38 is fast?

Fresh Breezes- Doug King