View Single Post
  #64   Report Post  
Jim Richardson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 01 Sep 2004 11:38:55 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
no it doesn't. take a look at those blades and you will understand, probably.
if not, ask any passing yardworker or dockboy to explain it to you.


Even the definition of feathering that you yourself brought into this
discussion fits the autoprop.




From: Jim Richardson
Date: 9/1/2004 5:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 01 Sep 2004 02:28:28 GMT,
JAXAshby wrote:
So,Doodles, what you are saying, is that unless the blades are totally
flat, the term "feathering" can not be used?

otn

let me help improve, over the knee, with your understanding of English

words.

v. feath·ered, feath·er·ing, feath·ers

v. tr.
To turn (an oar blade) almost horizontal as it is carried back after each
stroke.

To alter the pitch of (a propeller) so that the chords of the blades are
parallel with the line of flight.


Well, that fits the autoprop, thanks.

--
Jim Richardson
http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
-- Calvin










--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
Instrument of Darwin