P. Fritz,
My guess is Basskisser's employer is stuck with him. They had to hire
someone who is mentally handicapped so they could participate in some
federal bids.

I would also guess that Basskisser's role in "developing roofing details"
was deciding what kind of gravel they should use with the tar.




"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:PrFXc.318517$a24.172231@attbi_s03...
Basskisser,
This is another example of an addled brain.

John didn't say any of the things you are accusing him of.

I did.

What do you expect from someone that thinks developing developing roof
details for warehouses is a high level job....




ps - Do you like the way I kept it simple for you?


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message


Now, I'll ask one more time. Do YOU find it intelligent to get
some
idea in your head, then post that allegation, or assumption AS
FACT,
without any proof of those?

One more time? You've never asked me that question before. You did
ask
"...is it your contention that, if someone makes a claim, in order
for
it
to
be valid, you must include proof?" I answered that one as well as I
was
able, given the difficulty in ascertaining your exact meaning. What
you've
written above is an entirely new question.


Let's take an example, shall we? Because I
stated that my mother was an alcoholic, you and others
automatically
got it in your ignorant minds that I have FAS, and stated that AS
FACT, did you not?

Yes, I did not. I have never stated or implied any such thing.


Now, do you think that it's prudent to
automatically ASSUME that?

I don't think it is prudent to automatically assume anything.


If so, you are dumber than I ever imagined.

Well, that would be very dumb indeed.