NOYB wrote:
Narrow-mindedness? Because I don't know the names of all of the people
involved in the Watergate break-in and coverup?

I wouldn't call that narrowmindedness. I'd call it uneducated, or lack
of knowledge. Right up to the point where you start offering opinions
(or stating opinions strongly, including calling those who disagree
names) on the subject without any knowledge even when it's been held out
to you.

Then it becomes stupid.

... I was 2 years old when Dean
was testifying before the Senate Watergate Committee.

Still think his opinion on the secretiveness of the Bush White House is
irrelevant? Still think John Dean is a "liberal activist lawyer"?

DSK