jps wrote:
In article ,
says...
jps wrote:
In article ,
says...
My wife would never terminate a pregnancy. She considers it to be
murder, as do I.
I am a conservative. My views reflect the notion that people assume a
degree of personal responsibility for the actions that they engage it.
That means playing the cards you are dealt, and not looking to pass the
blame off onto other vague entities. A major philosophical difference
between liberals and conservatives.
Your arguments are ill-formed in unsubstantial. I can't afford the time
to banter with you.
In other words, you are in denial and are unprepared to back up what you
believe with anything that resembles logic or rationality. You beliefs
are based on superficial sound byte re-enforcement, based on biased
opinions of other equally sincere but misguided people.
Are you capable of an independant thought or are all of your premises
based on cut-N-paste articles?
JESUS CHRIST DAVE!!! You're an incredible regurgitator of that which
you've been accused.
Which you are evidently equally guilty of. You have yet to substantiate
any position you hold with anything more than cut and past articles. You
state many times that you diagree with conservate ideals, yet you offer
no rational reason why any of us should agree with you. Sound bytes and
catch phrases designed to appeal to emotions are hardly evidence enough.
When have I ever used cut and paste articles to make my point? You are
such a hypocrite, you can't even see it.
Not even a nice try. I'm on the verge of regarding you as a borg.
And until you can debate the issues with any depth beyond the sound-byte
level, I will regard you as a simpleton.
You've avoided answering the question at least 100 times.
Does your wife believe the government should be able to command her to
bring her pregnancy to full term?
They don't have to, since she feels that terminating it early is akin to
murder.
But since we don't try to prevent murder by forbidding people from
coming into contact with one another I guess, by the same token, the
government should not prevent people from seeking an abortion. But if
someone does it, they should be arrested for murder.
Why is the issue of abortion the only one where liberals favor a
person's right to choose? When it comes to programs like education,
healthcare, retirement, the right to carry arms, etc, you prefer
government mandates. Seems a bit duplicitous doesn't it?
I can pretty much guarantee you won't answer the question because you
probably don't know the answer yourself. And, just so you know, I
consider this pure speculation. No assertion of "fact."
And like so many other liberals, you'd be wrong.
I'd be right since you didn't answer the question. If you do know her
position then the answer is she doesn't accept the right wing's desire
to control her birth rights.
I'll make you a deal. If you can explain to me why a woman's right to
kill an unborn child should supercede that child's right to life, and
you can function on that level, I'll be more than happy to discuss the
dynamics of this issue. I refuse to give you a one dimensional answer to
such a multi-dimensional question.
And you also need to answer the question I posed to you about why
liberals are so gung-ho on the abortion choice issue, but shy away from
other issues of choice. Now try to explain that duplicity to me, if you
can.
You'll never admit that because it'd cause your rec.boats world to come
crashing down around you.
My self esteem is hardly defined by simple recreational pleasures such
as the intellectual equivilent of bitch slapping of emotionally blinded
liberals, with logic and rationality.
I learned to deal with issues starting as a young child. I am hardly a
fragile person, and I don't need "therapy".....
Dave
Doug, he did it again. Didn't answer the question, nor will he ever.
You are not worthy of an answer until you understand the question.
Dave