BoatBanter.com - View Single Post - O.T. Did I Really Say That: How soon they forget

In article ,
says...
jps wrote:

In article ,
says...
On 11 Nov 2003 07:02:52 GMT, (RGrew176) wrote:

Subject: Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop
weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our
bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

They don't forget. The leftists clouded obsession with power and
control renders all fairness and reasonable thought null and void.

Do we really think Harry believes half the stuff he posts here and in
other groups (under different names) as a paid democratic party shill?

Of course not, he and they don't care.

The recent memo which the democrats don't deny is easy recent proof of
any means to their ends, which is power and control.

And, as usual, you attempt to state opinion as fact.

You mean like the way you do when you cut and paste all those
"editorials" which support your biased viewpoint?

I cut and paste for your edificcation. You're showing little, if any
signs of progress.

In reality (which
is difficult enough for you) you know nothing about Harry and
speculating on his being a paid political operative and his personal
motives for what he says here so speculative.

The same way that you know nothing about the inner workings of the Bush
Adminmistration or the war on terrorism, other than what you read in the
speculative tripe that you pass off as "objective" journalism.

What does this have to do with Wilbur speculating on Harry's personal
motives? Harry is a person who's stating his opinions. The Bush
administration isn't.

Do you portend to know more about the motives of the Bush Admimistration
than Joe blow from Hackensack?

Have you read the New American Century doctrine? Do you know who Ken
Lay is? Blue Skies, No Child Left Behind, Terrorists and those who
harbor them?

What is there to know other than this?

And then, just like Rush, you use your ill-formed fantasy to make a
conclusion, which is even more outrageous.

And then, just like the numerous leftist news sources that you regularly
quote, you use your ill-formed fantasy to make a conclusion, which is
even more outrageous.

There's research and reasoning behind journalism. There's nothing but
innuendo, hate and assumed conclusion behind Rush. Taken apart, it's
nothing. Wilbur made a bunch of assumptions about Harry and then came
to a conclusion based on those assumption.

Your logic is flawed, your loyalties are clear. You have nothing in
that head resembling independent thought.

Dave, did you ever approach your wife to ask her if she thinks the
government shoud have a say is whether she should procreate or not.

My opinion is that you don't have a clue and that you're only here to
yank people's chains. That is until someone refers to you as a worm and
you break out of your box to your true remailing self.

Mr Pot, meet Mr. Kettle.

I don't remail vile crap. If I write it I post it under my own handle.

The sad irony is that you can't even see it.

See what? See, I'm using your logic now.

The sad part of this is that you'd spend so much time mounting such weak
arguments.