WaIIy wrote:
Uhhh, they never claimed to be on the same boat.

No, but that claim has often been made for them


Have you seen the ranks and medals of these people.


Yes, and I have also seen some of the evals some of them wrote for Kerry
at the time. Either they were lying then, or they were lying now.


They are all liars??

No they are all paid shills for Bush. Their statements should be of the
same import & moment as a Pepsi ad.

Its funny how they *say* they want to make their statements as a "public
service" but then, Kerry has been in the Senate for how many years?
without any of them saying diddley. Now all of a sudden they are
shilling for Bush, and doing so through an organization that takes
donations for political advertising. It's also a bit funny how none of
them have anything to say about Bush's service (or notable lack thereof).


Nobody would have said boo, but Kerry trots out his four months as if he
won WW2.

Agreed, I'm kind of tired of hearing about it. But it is emphasized far
more by the Bush/Cheney camp than by Kerry, so you can't blame him for
that... well, you can but it would be stupid...


You reap what you sow.

If that were entirely true, then FOX news would run bi-weekly 2-hour
documentaries on Bush's DUIs, his AWOL, his executive orders about
ultra-secrecy for his & Cheney's papers & memos, Cheney's finagling to
get Halliburton all those no-bid contracts & the overcharges, kickbacks,
and lost inventory ensuing, etc etc.... oh wait, those are all true, if
it were "reaping what you sow" it would have to be something trumped-up...

DSK