"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

Since elections aren't until next year, our troops will be there for
at
least that long. When all of the info comes out in September and
October
about the Iranian connection with al Qaeda, and about the Iranians
impending
acquisition of nukes, even you'll be calling for a US-led invasion.

Not with anyone named Bush in the White House. I don't trust the lying
buttwipe, his thug of a vice president, his fundie attorney general or
any of the other crapmeisters who make up the Bush misadministration.


Fine. fBut if Kerry is President, would you support a US-led invasion of
Iran if: a) further evidence comes forth about Iran's complicity in the
1998
Khobar Towers bombing and/or the 9/11 attack, or b) Iran remains
determined
to seek nukes despite UN condemnation.



We are building entirely new nuclear weapons, widening our arsenal in
violation of previous treaties. Why should we expect other countries to
behave?