Billgran wrote:
"K. Smith" wrote in message
...


but at the end you'll see that 7000 chucked

unemployed, 1.3 bil of pensioners money,


You might want to read up about George Soros (who plundered OMC) and how he
"changed" the OMC pension system before bankrupting the company, just prior
to being indicted by the French government for messing around with their
banking system. Now is using his own money to influence the US election. He
gets around.



Is that it Bill?? that's your technical rejoinder?? hmm

Soros (apologies got his name wrong earlier) is in cahoots with the
union pension funds, it was their money he tried to prop (little pun
there) OMC up with, but the money regardless of it's source was spent
trying to make Ficht work & despite 1.3 bil it didn't.

Bomb have some proper engineers (aircraft, 2 stroke rotax etc) who
actually understand this stuff & must have had a pup when they actually
looked at what Bomb had brought home from the fire sale this time:-) at
any price it was a disaster & they rightly chucked it so they could stem
the bleeding.

Lean mixtures at power make unreliable engines all the big
manufacturers know it, any mixtures not properly atomised will lead to
unreliability, again look at all the big manufacturers & the trouble
they go to to get proper atomisation "before" the charge is in the
chamber, add lean mixtures & poor atomisation together & it seems a
failure rate of 1 in 5 can result.

Your well polished VRO style of keep saying "it's all fixed now" but
then you don't give any details, seeing it was your head of camp that
gave the 1 in 5 number it now falls on you who wants to again market
this crap, you have to explain exactly what caused the 1 in 5 & what has
been done to fix it & what is the expected failure rate now, 1 in 10??
still way too high.

In the past you've blamed all & everything; oil, piston manufacturer,
the tooth fairy but never ever confronted the reality that during the
whole Ficht debacle you were merrily selling the carbed OMC OBs, same
power, same basic components, yet they were about as reliable as any
prior OMC engine fitted with VRO. It wasn't the oil, it wasn't the
pistons, Soros didn't have any technical say, it was always the Ficht
DFI, the low injection pressures (it never was hundreds of PSI that was
a lie but even if true it was never going to be enough) which gave poor
atomisation which meant pockets of the charge were too rich & others too
lean = detonation under power, the design trying to fudge it past the
EPA with super lean mixtures (your mob claimed 40-1!!! & your claimed
fuel savings at low speed when calculated out confirm!!! despite you
trying to recant when you finally realised what an admisssion it was) it
all means any real power in HP/ltr terms when lean will lead to
detonation & it does.

Blaming soros!!!:-) what for being conned by a bunch of union grease
monkey amateurs???:-) I do like it though you're inventive with the
dealer excuses & spam, pity you can't turn that to the engines:-)

K