"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...

Kerry knew that the supplemental to Senate bill 1689 included things
like
body armor to troops, and pay raises and/or extension of benefits for
veterans. Yet, he voted to kill the entire bill. It's fine to be
against
certain provisions in a bill, but must you kill the entire bill because
of
a
couple of provisions that you don't like? Particularly when those
provisions would save the life of soldiers at a time when they're in
harm's
way? That was a terrible choice on Kerry's part...and no explanation
is
satisfactory to the family of any soldier who could have been killed
because
he didn't have the necessary body armor.



So, you don't know why he voted against it? Are you aware that some slobs
in
Congress tag totally unrelated (and often hideous) riders onto bills?


Yea, and usually those same people are democrats.

Dave

Choking your chicken again? Please post information from a DIRECT
congressional source to prove what you just said. You'll need to read the
actual legislation in order to know what you're talking about. See ya next
week.