"FamilySailor" wrote in message
...
Huh? Bush said that there were WMDs. There are none. He
said Iraq was an iminent threat. It wasn't. Those were lies. What
"IS" are you talking about?

OK, what is a weapon of mass destruction. Is saran (sp?) gas a weapon of
mass destruction?

No it isn't. Weapons of Mass Destruction are defined as weapons that are
capable of *mass* destruction.

These are nuclear and biological weapons.

Chemical weapons don't count.


Is putting out a hit on the George Bush a threat to America?

Quite the opposite. America would be much safer without him.



Is firing
missiles at American fighter pilots a threat? All you need is one and it
was
not a lie.

Invading Iraq threatened more US lives than firing missiles at US fighter
pilots. How many US servicemen died as a result of Saddam's missiles?
How many died as a result of the invasion?



There are many more, but no liberal will ever be satisfied,




because it does not suit their political Bush hating agenda. What if the
weapons were shipped out of the country, say in just a hand full of
trucks,
would that mean he still lied.

Were they? What if you were so brainwashed that you would cling to the
flimsiest of straws?


What if that is the facts!

You don't need to resort to "what if" for the facts. We know the facts!

Maybe you don't
really know enough to be qualified to accuse the man of being a liar.

Did Saddam have WMD? ... OR did Bush lie?



Regards


Donal
--