"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
Of course Saddam had them. He used them on his own people.

When did he use them on his own people?

Why did the Allies do nothing at the time?


I can think of a hundred thousand reasons why Saddam needed
to be stopped. Can you doubt it?

Yes.

In international law there is only *one* acceptable reason to invade a
sovereign state.

If you can think of more than one reason, then you are favouring the
disregard of international law.



I don't believe Bush lied.

Really? He said that Saddam had WMD. Do you still believe that Saddam had
WMD when the invasion occurred?


He made the right decision based on
the information he had. I also know that much of the intelligence
the President has at his disposal will never be revealed to insure
it won't be compromised.

Nonsense!



Bush sent a message to the world. Tyrants will be punished.

No .... the message is that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts
absolutely.


I can only fault him for taking so long to respond. He has more
patience that I. He showed great diplomatic restraint. He shows
the proper resolve now, not to let thugs rule by terror.

He is a thug. He rules Iraq by terror.



I fault many other nations for failing to step forward and
address issues like this throughout the world. The USA can't
do it alone. It is too bad the UN is inept and unable to take
decisive action when it needs to be done.

So, you are saying that a mental defective, like Bush, can override the UN??



Regards

Donal
--