Horvath wrote:

Keep spinning all you want, but you can't change the facts.


I'm not the one trying to change them.

Every year that Clinton was in office we owed more money.

Right, because future obligations increased.

Expenditures exceeded income. Period.

No, they didn't. Period.

Don't try to cover it up with government bonds, interest on the debt,
or any magical accounting. There was no surplus.

So what do you call it when the government brings in more
than $200M more in taxes than it spends?