"Wally" wrote in message
...
....
I didn't say you did. I said that your argument is flawed because it
presupposes something whose existence it supposedly substantiates - it begs
the question.

I like to see someone use that expression in its original meaning.



only that the fact you can
create anything lends credence to a guiding force.

I disagree. I'm pragmatic about creating art. It happens. I don't feel a
need to invent something to explain how it happens - because I don't feel a
need to explain how it happens. Call it a talent, something I have a knack
for. I do it because I enjoy the doing of it and because I like what I
create.


Actually, I think the real "gift" is the ability to appreciate beauty. Given
that as a basic human trait, it only follows that some would be better then
others at creating it. However, that still falls far short as a scientific
proof.