"Wally" wrote in message
...
Donal wrote:

You "imagined" an unfortunate 12y/o girl in your attempt to prove
that God sidn't exist.

There is no onus on him to prove that god doesn't exist. In fact, he's
already declared that he's agnostic - why would he seek to substantiate a
proposition that he hasn't asserted? The claim that stands to be proven is
that goes does exist, and the onus is on the believers to prove their
claim.

Rubbish!

Why do you place the onus on the believers? Are you suggesting that the
non-believers should be given the benefit of the doubt?


Why should non-believers be given more credence than believers?

I think that it is very strange that you will not give any scientific
evidence to back up your position. I've repeatedly given evidence to
support my views.



Regards


Donal
--