On 02 Apr 2004 23:53:19 GMT, JAXAshby wrote:

the only circumstance that might allow a bringing a restricted
weapon (all handguns) into the country would be participation in a
recognized
shooting competition.

or for protection from animals. Not an issue in much of the country,
but can
be a concern in the Canadian Rockies.

any old excuse will do huh? the animals that are left here in Canada used
to roam the USA as well....but fearfull men with small penis's killed tham
all from a distance....now they must look to other social groups for their
nemisis

So...if you run into a griz bear in your boat i am sure you will be
needing more than a gun to get you back on track. What is it about that
mentality that requires so much protection form so many things? I ask in
seriousness because it looks saddly fearful form my stance...that so much
hostility has been created that you need a gun to give you peace of mind
in Canada...i can't think of a safer country close to the USA now...?

The Canadians used to much more strict re the survival gear
required (for remote areas) but have made the law rather nubulous now.
survival gear for remote areas is considered prudent.

what is "nubulous" and what do you know of Canadian policy and law?
seriously?


That said, I have no use for weapons today, having used then in earnest
as a young man in the employ of my Uncle Sam.

Very well. that was then and this os now right?
Good dayJax



--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/