"Joe" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
om...
I guess that's why I said you were manipulating the data and being
deceitful. The non-indexed numbers are obviously there, and I accused
you
of deliberately ignoring them. I guess "I was in error" too. The
thought
never occurred to me that you just didn't see 'em.


Ya know what's interesting? Gould, in his first post on this thread used
the
following GDP numbers-

1997 GDP: 8,318.4
2002 GDP: 10446.2


The other funny thing about those numbers is that they don't appear anywhere
on the link that he kept citing as his "source". Look:
http://www.bea.gov/briefrm/tables/ebr1.htm
(That's the source he kept referencing in his argument)

In fact, those numbers are the "actual" GDP numbers...the same numbers he
now claims that he never saw on the bea.gov website in the first place.
Then where did he get them?

I believe this is the point where he can no longer claim an "honest
mistake"...and has lost any and all credibility in this debate.