I guess that's why I said you were manipulating the data and being
deceitful. The non-indexed numbers are obviously there, and I accused you
of deliberately ignoring them. I guess "I was in error" too. The thought
never occurred to me that you just didn't see 'em.


"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Not from the same page of course, but from the same BEA website. You said
there weren't any non indexed numbers on the BEA website, which there
are.

In which case I have no choice but to admit that I was in error. Once I
found
the page with the GDP numbers, it did not occur to me to look for
additional
pages where different versions of the statistic might be reported.

I hope the phrase, "I admit that I was in error" doesn't cause a complete
short
circuit throughout usenet. It's not often seen on the screen. :-)