dougies, I keep forgetting how stupid you are and thus keep trying to speak to
you as a grade school graduate.

a generator producing just 100 watts is of no interest in this discussion.
None. You, doguies, don't know what 100 watts is, so you keep trying to force
fit some obscure to you knowledge into the tiny cavity that is your brain.

dogies, the discuss has been about hp vs fuel usage. little hp produced means
little fuel used; no hp produced means no fuel used. That is self-evident and
trivial. It brings nothing to the table in the discussion of hp vs fuel used.

dumb squat. go sleep it off.

see, dougies, that's why you have the problems you have. you can't
understand
English.

And yet somehow, you're the one who is always making mistakes in basic
reading comprehension.


hours exist without regard -- as in totally independent of -- moving
pistons.
Really.

So, an engine hour meter has no correlation to the amount of time that
particular engine has had it's pistons in motion?


Therefore, an engine that is not running doesn't use any fuel at all.
Really.

Unless it leaks.

Again, your basic reading comprehension is at fault here. You claimed
that an engine that was never run would have an average fuel consumption
of zero. Of course, due to your peculiar psychological issues, you
cannot admit you made a mistake (much less thousands of them). But you
could at least stop digging.


Has nothing to do with either the concept or reality of "zero".

go sleep it off, dougies.

Is it getting to be your nap time, Jaxxie? Are you getting a little cranky?

DSK