Donal wrote:
"otnmbrd" wrote in message
ink.net...

Hell, just so you know, there's nothing threatening about your manner
(at least to me), but your intelligence, and more specifically,
knowledge of the Rules, is now in question with these responses.
I read this and the other responses, and have to assume
"Troll"......i.e., no longer worth a response.


Well, I assumed that you were taking an intelligent approach to this
discussion. Obviously, I was incorrect!

I say this with confidence for *one* simple reason.


All along, my only assertion has been that Joe was breaking the CollRegs by
doing 25 kts, in fog, using his Radar as his means of keeping a visual
lookout.


I have posted a link to the UK's Maritime & Coastguard Agency's advice on
the subject, to back up my position.

You have posted no evidence whatsoever.


You sounded fairly reasonable when you entered this discussion, so I made
extra efforts to be polite. However, you have not offered any evidence to
back up your position. I'm beginning to wonder if you are as stupid as the
two "J"'s????

Regards

Donal

ROFL Try to keep up, Donal. My latest responses have been in regard to
your statements to Jeff, regarding whistle signals, stand on status, and
giving a wide berth, in fog.
To be blunt, your response was stupid and showed a lack of working
knowledge of the rules and general collision avoidance in fog.
Nuff said!

otn