Max, it's not bobby. It's Gilligan. Check the headers. Gilligan
isn't bull****ting (about this anyway).

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Bobsprit" wrote in message

Not if I can find other jerks. Just look at what goes on in this
newsgroup.

This NG is hardly representative of anything beyond this NG. Thankfully.

This type of monitoring is very easy to circumvent. I can easily change
the
risetime and overshoot of the key-on characteristics of my rig by using
a
modified circuit for paddle keys or by simply placing the end of the
antenna
in a bucket of saline (secondary dielectric moding). The modulation is
easily changed by running into a cheapo audio equalizer. The more
complex
analyses such as instantaneous AM-PM conversion or cycle to cycle
variation
can be overcome by such methods as varying the regulator voltage on the
transmit section or by changing the order, type or phase margin of the
transmitter phase locked loop. In other words, with every transmission
it
will appear as a different transmitter.

Amusing, Bobby. Nice job of bull****ting, though. You might actually
fool
some here.

Your simplistic fox hunting techniques are also very easy to evade. An
amplitude detecting direction finder is useless for short transmissions
of
varying amplitude. Your silly phase modulated techniques are also
useless.
I
can easily overcome them with an asynchronous QAM subcarrier.

LOL.

The FCC does not have the time or resources to catch me. I will prevail.

You might. A few do. But most just get bored with being ignored and go
away.

Max