"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...

"Donal" wrote in message
...
Calling me a faker is accusing me of deception.

If I prove, beyond all doubt, that I am not a faker, would that mean
that
you lied when you said that I was a faker?

If you answer "yes", then I will answer all your original questions as
soon
as I read your post.


Are you actually claiming John "lied" when he suggested you are a faker?
You
should be pleased! You were trying your best to act like a fool, weren't
you?



As I have repeatedly said, I will prove you wrong within the next 6
days.

You're even trying to out do Boobsprit!


Jeff, I find it really odd that you cannot see the real situation. You are
going to be part of my proof that JohnE lied. Isn't that wonderful?

I'm sorry that you invited yourself into this little debacle. I bore you no
ill will. However, it was your choice.

It's funny, but I had seen you as a serious poster. Now, I see that you
allow your thoughts to be governed by your preconceptions.

Let me explain.

You tried to say that Joe was right about keeping a "Radar" only lookout,
while doing 25 kts in fog. You retracted your position as soon as it was
pointed out to you that the CollRegs expressly require a lookout "by sight
and sound".

That was an incredibly stupid situation to get yourself into. ...
Especially for someone who thinks that he understands the CollRegs.

How could someone as intelligent as you make such a stupid mistake?

I believe that your preconceptions led you to believe that I was
bul****ting. If I'm wrong, then please tell us why you think that it is OK
to do 25kts in thick fog, using radar as your only means of keeping a
lookout.



Regards


Donal
--




Regards


Donal
--