Australians' disgusting behaviour
Donal wrote:
"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
Donal wrote:
"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
Donal wrote:
"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
And that is where you are so wrong. The fact is that we can predict
exactly where the atom will be for a short period with perfect
accurace
-that's thanks to QED. The problem is that the solution to greater
times
becomes too complex. This does not mean that information content right
now is infinite.
Of course it does!
Can you not break the next second into an infinite number of smaller
time
frames?
That has nothing to do with the energy content of the system.
The discussion started with the contention that man's ignorance was
infinite. You introduced the "energy content" as a method of proving
that
information was, in some way, finite. However, the sum total of energy
contained in the Universe is not related to the sum total of information
about the Universe. I have already demonstrated that information can
be
related to time. As any unit of time can be divided into an infinite
number
of sub-units, then the information regarding anything at all, can be
divided into an infinite number of discrete pieces of information.
Information and energy have a very close connection. The minimum amount
of energy required to store a bit of information has been known for
quite some time. Since the energy content of the universe is finite it
follows that the information content is also finite for without energy
there is no information storage -i.e. that information does not exist.
Of course the amount of information is very very large but it's not
infinite -unless a big number means infinity to you...
The sum total of energy that exists in our Universe may well be finite.
However, the sum total of knowledge about the behaviour of any single
electron, in any single atom, is infinite!
No it isn't. Is it that you are confused about wave-particle duality -or
perhaps you are asking meaningless questions which cannot be answered
because there is no information in their answers?
Does an electron exist?
Only when it's interacting with something.
Is it a physical entity?
Yes it has rest mass
If so, then it must occupy a position in space!
Yes, when measured.
Therefore, it will occupy an infinite number of positions in the next
second - because the next second contains an infinite number of points in
time.
After measurement you will have to remeasure it's position and at at
that moment it does not occupy an infinite numer of positions. Do you
see it now -that the wave function collapses on measurement means that
the information conetent is finite.
Cheers MC
Regards
Donal
--
|