two wheels wrote:


A little remedial education:

A "fact" has to be true.

GW was never AWOL.

Go back and re read your above two statements. Rather a serious
disconnect there.

If it's not in his military records, it didn't
happen. No superior of his (in a position to know) said that his
absences were without leave.

No, but two of his superiors were unaware that he was attached to their
command and said that he never showed up for duty as scheduled. The
fact that AWOL charges were never preferred (or perhaps removed from
his record) does not 'prove' that he completed his obligation.

In any event, since he avoided going to Viet Nam unlike Al Gore, what
is so honorable about GWB's military service?



And, as for the flying:

They were about to "mothball" the F-102 Delta Dagger interceptor
that Bush had been trained on. It was obsolete. The F-102 was
designed to intercept Soviet bombers. So, if he wanted to continue
flying, he'd have to train on the new-generation replacement
jet--all over again........ (snipped for brevity)...

blah bla blah.... I thought that 'conservatives' were supposed to take
responsibility for their actions, not yabble on and on with a lot of
whiny excuses. I guess there is a double standard.

DSK