"two wheels" wrote in message
...

Firearms deer-hunting was open here last week. Funny, that store
managers won't let me carry my deer rifle around in the clothing
store when I look for some warm socks. After all, my rifle was
designed as a deer rifle--no deer in the store--and so could never
be used for anything else, right?




If WMD equipment couldn't be (falsely) assigned a benign purpose,
the Iraqis simply didn't buy it. They weren't stupid. I don't know
who's right about the trucks, but it's not as simple as you make it
sound.

Why not? The trucks were built with a single purpose in mind. They hadn't
been modified. They were only capable of performing a single function.

Don't you think that it is time that you considered the possibility that the
rest of the world *might* be right about this?

Do you really believe that Blix is wrong? Do you really believe that major
weaponry can be produced without big industrial installations?


There is NO evidence that Saddam had WMD for one simple reason. Why are you
unable to think about this?



Regards


Donal
--