Try reading 1441.

Cheers MC

Simple Simon wrote:

If Saddam was complying with the previous resolutions why
on earth would the security council vote unanimously for
a resolution that stated he was not complying and should be
forced to comply?

What is your IQ anyway? It must be in the two-digit range.

You're sooooooo stupid.

S.Simon


"The_navigator©" wrote in message ...

Good lord man he was complying with 1441! WTF do you think was in the 10
tons of paper he sent to the US? Why was he taking apart Al samoud
missiles (which were not in breach anyway)? Can you really be that
dense, bigoted and blind all at the same time?

MC

Simple Simon wrote:


So how do you explain this 'vast majority' voting
unanimously for UN resolution 1441?

S.Simon


The Captains Nemesis wrote in message ...


Cappy, you forget that a vast majority of countries felt that the
evidence was in dispute with the assumptions of the US Govt.
It's just that they'd been planning for an invasion for so long that
they didn't want to spoil the party.

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 19:50:15 -0500, "Simple Simon"
wrote:



And Monday morning quarterbacking is such an
accomplishment! Wow, I'm impressed when
anybody feels second-guessing is valid
criticism or worth reading.

S.Simon


The Captains Nemesis wrote in message ...


Seems to me that another 6 months would have revealed that Sadam was
hiding NOTHING, and a whole bunch of American lives would have been
saved PLUS those of Iraqi citizens....you know, the human beings that
don't rate a mention as casualties of the US invasion.




Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.