Is there a point to all this nonsense? Why does an anonymous poster have to prove who he
is? You're already asserting that you don't want your identity known; with PGP you're
just making yourself look stupid, since there's no one out there actually checking. At
least Horry has an excuse - he's about as sharp as a bowling ball.


"two wheels" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:06:33 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Like I said, mostly worthless stuff added to a post....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6VNJNCBA23eyf45EQK2EgCfSL63Uwmga7eK924eyh3tY5 c3xUMAn1HC
l5uRrwReNBFHdk7QiUiLYJjY
=D2rn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


*** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION ***
*** Status: Bad Signature
*** Alert: Signature did not verify. Message has been altered.
*** Signer: two wheels
(0xDEC9FE39)
*** Signed: 11/2/2003 12:29:56 PM
*** Verified: 11/2/2003 3:58:49 PM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

Like I said, mostly worthless stuff added to a post....


*** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6V+ZdCBA23eyf45EQLF5gCgg2zVDaQeQm/uQAlbQEkCNbnHybQAnjMq
ZmhBlLA9o4TAwPys37YXjD/g
=Hyal
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----