ROFLMAO Sheesh, you're "simple"

Simple Simon wrote:

Then what you're claiming is there is never an in-sight
circumstance in restricted visibility? He he, gotcha!

Nope. Are you claiming there's always an insight circumstance in
restricted visibility?

If you answer in the infirmative you are patently incorrect
as I have proven already.

If you answer in the "infirmative" you are patently incorrect as I have
proven already.

It is clear that in-sight situations occur on a regular basis
in restricted visibility. You said yourself that in-sight rules
apply when vessels are in sight. Therefore, since in-sight
rules require full adherance to the pecking order rules it
follows that oftentimes in restricted visibility there is a
pecking order. When there is a pecking order there is
a stand-on vessel and a give-way vessel.

Only when both vessels are close enough or have moved into clearer
visibility that they can see each other or so close that we're in double
"OhChit" mode, but then, we aren't talking about restricted visibility
when we get to this point for these to vessels, now are we?

You tugboat captains have insisted there is no such thing
as a stand-on vessel in or near an area of restricted
visibility. The above paragraph proves you all incorrect.

Negative we have insisted that there is no stand-on vessel, in or near
an area of restricted visibility, if BOTH or either vessel can not see
the other ..... a point you fail to grasp.

Accept it and live with it! I was right, I am right and I
forever shall remain right (unless and until they clarify this
discrepancy in the Rules).

Accept it and live with it! You were wrong and still are wrong and still
and always will be a danger to other boaters and yourself, until you
learn the "Rules"


otn