|
|
|
|
Announcment of Outlawry
Derrick Parfitt wrote in
:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:08:14 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax"
wrote:
"Derrick Parfitt" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:39:47 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax"
wrote:
"Derrick Parfitt" wrote in message
.. .
On 16 Sep 2003 07:19:45 -0700, (Doug
Freyburger) wrote:
Let me get this straight. You're supporting a repeat offender
child buggerer, right? Wow.
No, I do not support the "child buggerers" actions. He has been
dealt with by the authorities. It should be left at that.
And when he gets out you're happy that nobody in the Asatru
community
knows
what he did, and will almost inevitably do again?
You are right. I stand corrected. Everyone should be notified of
what the child molester has done.
My displeasure was with the fact that outlawery can be applied
haphazardly and for personal or political gain. This was not the
case in the present situation with the child molester.
Well, most of the cases of 'outlawry' that I've heard of in the past
have been a trivialisation of that ancient punishment.
In this case, however, I think it justified.
Although, if one were to take it literally it would mean that any
Asatruar who killed him would be subject to no opprobrium from those
Asatruar who agreed with such a penalty.
You are correct. Any reprisal against this child molester cannot be
done. Well, it can , but the potential rath of the authorities will
probably prevent anything happening to this person.
Aww, Djirkie could do a swastie painting!
Bertie
|