I use personal insults because liberal assholes like
you deserve no better. If and when you decide
to take terrorism seriously and do something to
fight it instead of supporting it you should be
damned glad that personal insults are the ONLY
thing you are subject to.

More comments below.

"Donal" wrote in message ...
What has this to do with the topic?

It has everything to do with the topic because ignorance
can easily be recognized. You might not like it but if the
shoe fits, wear it!

What a strange answer. You started out by saying that I was wrong, and
then you proceeded to say the same thing!!!

Only to an ignorant fool like yourself are the facts strange!

They thought that attacking Iraq will cause an increase in global terrorism.

They thought wrong! Are you and they so stupid that you think
fighting terrorism will make it increase? Only an idiot would think
doing NOTHING but giving aid and comfort to terrorists like you
do will lessen the chances of a terrorist attack right where you
live. Ignoring it won't make it go away. Only liberals are so stupid
to think that way.

Some US companies are doing very well out of the recent war. Oddly, they
are not only American companies, but they all seem to have very close ties
to the Bush administration.

Show me the books and prove your statements before
you expect anyone to believe you. You continue to repeat
liberal lies and propaganda.

Uh oh!!!! I think that you have just revealed that you are a liberal at
heart. That's a pity. It's more fun argueing with a redneck.

Among all your other ignorance's you now demonstrate you
don't even know the definition of a liberal.

Nobody is claiming that Iraq never possessed WMD. The only issue was the
threat posed by those WMD. If there was no threat, then there was no real
excuse for the war.

Bull****! That's exactly what you sniveling liberals are claiming. You demand
proof of the existence of actual WMD's and when you don't get proof
you say "Bush lied - there are no WMDs". You admit WMDs existed yet
you somehow claim they represent no threat. Even if Saddam destroyed
every WMD the fact the he knows how to built more is enough of a threat
for civilized men in view of the fact that he has already demonstrated a
willingness to use them against his own people. You are just so stupid
and illogical it is beyond belief.

The big question is "Was Bush so stupid that he really believed that Iraqi
WMD posed a threat?" 80% of the world's population did not think so.

And, where do you come up with that figure? It's just more liberal
pie-in-the-sky. It would more logical to claim 80% of the world's
population could care less about what's going on in Iraq. It certainly
would be easier to prove.

The situation in Iraq is under control.

So why is Bush asking for international help??

He's hoping countries lead by sane men will feel at least
a little inclined to do what is RIGHT! What's wrong with
helping an oppressed Iraqi populace to establish a productive
and free country? Why are you and your liberal ilk so against
it?

Maybe you should stop watching Fox! Only the incidents that result in US
deaths are being reported. These are only a small proportion of the total.

I don't watch television. I see what your problem is now if
that's where you get your information.

Nope! So far they have been proved to be absolutely correct. There were
no WMD, and there was no link between Al Q'aeda and Saddam.

Illogical - above you said you never claimed there were no WMDs. As
a matter of fact you said the exact opposite - you can't have it both ways
you hypocrite.

I'm not galled by the situation. I am surprised that the Bush spin machine
has managed to turn this into a left vs right issue, and that they have also
managed to make it a test of "patriotism". Do Republicans really believe
that democrats are not patriotic? If so, then you have some really tough
times ahead.

There are many sensible and patriotic Democrats - not all Democrats
are liberal. It's only the liberal Democrats who are doing the 'spinning".
Liberals are anti-American and that's a proven fact. Try reading Ann
Coulter's new book, "Treason" and you'll understand why I say this.

The Iraqis appear to be becoming more hostile to the occupying forces.
There is also evidence that Al Q'aeda are gaining a foothold in parts of
Iraq. I assume that you can see the irony - Bush says that Iraq needs to be
invaded because Saddam is providing training camps for Al Q'aeda, and the
invasion creates the environment that allows AL Q'aeda to set up shop. This
alone proves that Bush is an idiot.

Negative! It proves President George W. Bush is very savvy
and knows it's much much much better to fight and destroy any
and all terrorists over in Iraq with soldiers than it is to have them
doing their dirty work in our cities. Like the President said, "Bring
'em on!" Let's see how successful Al Queerda is against people
who can and do fight back.

So you must think that the US approves of the terrorist attacks??? Get
real!

As long as the terrorists engage our military in Iraq - BRING THEM ON!
What don't you understand about this. Would you rather be fighting the
same terrorists with your unarmed Bobbies in the streets of London!
Gawd what an ASS!

Many of the terrorists in Iraq were *not* terrorists before the war. There
has been a nett increase in terrorism. Bush will not be able to confine it
to Iraq.

Says who? More liberal lies and wishful thinking. You are actually
admitting you support terrorists with this statement. You are claiming
that terrorism cannot be defeated. You are a cowardly waste of space.


S.Simon - knows Donal is a terrorist sympathizer and proves it.