They can't help it if they don't have my remote viewing
abilities but at least they made educated guesses based
on computer projections. Some of these programs are
very sophisticated. They are not the sort of thing one
can run on a home computer. You need a Cray!

What amazes me is I, with only my trained brain, can
look at a weather map and satellite images, give it a
few minutes thought, do some work with my dividers
and look at the big picture and in less time than it takes
the models, by far, I can match or beat their predictions
the majority of the time. When things are a bit uncertain
they hedge and say a storm is too far from land to predict
while I predict by what I see not caring how many days
from land the storm may be. I'm that confident and that
GOOD!

S.Simon - almost as good at weather prognostication as
sailing safely and sanely while teaching even
the professionals how it should be done.


wrote in message ...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:17:59 -0400, "Simple Simon" wrote:


wrote in message ...

Anyone who has seriously studied the science knows that anything beyond 3 days
is pretty much a WAG. 5 days is no better than reading tea leaves.

Billy Boy, Bobsprit is right about you. You're just plain dumb!

Clean the wax (being kind calling feces wax) out of your ears.
The National Weather Services this year started giving four and
five day track forecasts for hurricanes.


And they are WAG's. All they can say is that IF conditions stay exactly as they
are at this moment, this is what MAY happen. That's commonly called speculation.

BB