BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Keyser Soze[_4_]

wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:37:38 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 22:46:52 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 10:18:54 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 06:42:32 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 8:56:32 AM UTC-4, Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2021 07:24:53 -0400, John wrote:

On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 14:20:39 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:01:36 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 08:03:11 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 4/6/21 12:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:43:50 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Wrote in message:r
On Mon, 05 Apr 2021 18:28:11 -0400, Wayne
wrote:On Mon, 05 Apr 2021 12:47:31 -0400, John
wrote:On Mon, 05 Apr 2021 12:23:40 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:On Mon, 05 Apr 2021
07:01:38 -0400, John wrote:On
Sun, 04 Apr 2021 11:30:05 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:On Sun, 04 Apr 2021
07:19:44 -0400, John wrote: Trump
ought to end up in prison for the various horrors he
perpetrated on this country.Wayne probably agrees
wholeheartedly with that, even
though it's bull****.===That will eventually
be decided by the justice system, not by internetdiscussion
groups. I've always considered you to be a "law and
order"type of guy so I find it interesting that you're so quick to
dismissTrump's questionable behavior just because you support his
policygoals.Trump perpetrated no 'horrors' upon this
country.===That will eventually be determined by
the justice system. It seemslikely that neither your
opinion, Harry's, or mine will have mucheffect on the
outcome.You think the justice system may find him guilty of 'perpetuating
horrors
this country'? You must have a broad definition of 'horror'. A lot of
propertyowners and folks experienced *real* horror during the
riots this past summer. Ofcourse, those were just 'peaceful protests'.
Bull****.And, FWIW, I dismiss none of Trump's illegal activities (once
adjudicated assuch) regardless of my
support
for his policy goals.===I think that if you look back at the
origin of this thread you'll findthat "horror" was Harry's
choice of words, not mine. That said, Iregard any attempt to
subvert a free and valid election, which thecourts have ruled,
to be very serious. Hopefully you do also.The riots of last summer, and
the
resulting damage, are a totallyseparate issue. It could be
argued however that Trump's inflammatoryrhetoric was at least partially
responsible. Loose cannons rollingaround on deck can do a lot of damage.
(please note clever boatingreference)If this was the first
time cities burned, I might agree with you. Letssee
if
you
blame Biden in a week when Minneapolis goes up in flames.

I'm sure that the Floyd family will donate a substantial amount
of the 27 million to rebuilding the destruction that will be done
in Floyds behalf.

I bet Crump took $13.5 million of it already.

Just for fun, let's take a perfectly healthy white cop who has never had
a drink or taken opioids or had a tough life and have a big guy step on
his neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds and see what happens...

Since there was no sign of trauma and asphyxiation in the original
autopsy report, nothing. He was just restrained.

I also pointed out, if he had at any time said "I give up, I will get
in the car" the whole thing would have been over.

If you fight with the cops or refuse to obey a lawful order from them
bad **** happens.
It is interesting that you and Wayne don't seem to have any trouble at
all with the cops shooting an unarmed white woman for trespassing tho.

===

It was much more than trespassing - more like breaking and entering
combined with assault or attempted assault. I firmly believe the cop
thought that he and/or members of congress were in danger, and they
probably were.

Bull****. She assaulted no one, and didn't get through the window.
===

I'm surprised that you are so quick to defend lawless behavior like
that.

I'm surprised you're OK with police killing an unarmed, defenseless woman.

===

Is a woman who is attempting to break into a secured area less guilty
than a guy?

Use of deadly force has nothing to do with guilt. It has to do with
the imminent threat to the officer and in this case being an unarmed
woman is significant.

===

Doesn't an angry mob trying to break down your secured door constitute
an imminent threat? It does in my mind. And was she truly unarmed?
Didn't she break the window with some sort of club? If not her, it
was someone else in the vicinity. There were all sorts of improvised
weapons being used.

A couple hundred people in the Capitol and a ****load of armed cops
(The CapPo has over 1700 sworn) and this is the ONE who needed to be
shot.
If this was a black woman DC would have been in flames.

Nothing quite like your racist speculations. Maybe you can rev up Herring,
Just an Asshole, Bilious, or the others.

--
Lock Trump Up!